AI-Assisted QA Pipeline Visualization

1

📝 Pull Request Created

                            # Developer pushes changes and creates PR

                            git push origin feature/payment-validation

                            gh pr create --title "Add payment validation"

Detected Changes: authentication.py, PaymentService.java, payment.ts
Languages: Python, Java, TypeScript
Risk Level: HIGH (includes security-sensitive code)

2

⚡ Static Analysis (Parallel Execution)

🐍 Python

Ruff

Line 45: Unused import 'datetime'

Line 78: Line too long (92 > 88)

Pylint

Missing docstring in public method

Variable 'x' doesn't conform to snake_case

Bandit

Line 123: Use of hardcoded password

Line 156: SQL query uses string formatting

mypy

Argument type mismatch: expected 'int', got 'str'

Missing return type annotation

☕ Java

SpotBugs

Possible null pointer dereference in PaymentService

Resource not closed: database connection

PMD

Avoid empty catch blocks

Overly complex method (cyclomatic 18)

Checkstyle

Missing Javadoc comment

Line exceeds 100 characters

OWASP Check

CVE-2024-1234 in jackson-databind 2.12.0

Outdated Spring Boot version with known vulnerabilities

🟦 TypeScript/JS

ESLint

Unexpected use of 'eval()'

Missing semicolon

Unused variable 'tempData'

Prettier

Inconsistent indentation (2 vs 4 spaces)

TypeScript

Type 'string | null' not assignable to 'string'

Implicit 'any' type in function parameter

3

🤖 AI Semantic Analysis (Sequential)

🛡️

Security Review

Authentication token stored in plaintext in session. Use encrypted storage or server-side sessions.

Payment amount calculation doesn't validate decimal precision - can lead to rounding errors.

🏗️

Architecture Review

Payment service directly accesses database - should use repository pattern for testability.

Mixing business logic with HTTP handling - consider separating concerns.

✨

Code Quality Review

Function complexity score: 15 (threshold: 10) - consider breaking into smaller functions.

Duplicate validation logic in payment.py and refund.py - extract to shared utility.

⚡

Performance Review

N+1 query detected: Loading payment records in loop. Use batch fetch or join.

Missing index on 'user_id' column - queries will be slow with large datasets.

🧪

Testing Review

No tests for negative payment amounts - critical edge case missing.

Missing test for concurrent payment processing - race condition risk.

4

📊 Result Aggregation & Deduplication

🔄 Combining Results...

Merging findings from 11 static analyzers and 5 AI review aspects
Deduplicating similar issues • Categorizing by severity • Calculating statistics

4

🔴 Critical

9

🟠 High

13

🟡 Medium

5

🔵 Low

⚠️ BLOCKING: Critical issues detected - PR cannot be merged

5

💬 GitHub Feedback Posted

📝 PR Comments Generated

🔴 CRITICAL authentication.py:123

Security: Hardcoded password detected

Never store credentials in code. Use environment variables or a secrets manager.

Found by: Bandit, Security Review (AI)

🔴 CRITICAL PaymentService.java:45

Security: CVE-2024-1234 in jackson-databind dependency

Critical vulnerability in jackson-databind 2.12.0. Upgrade to 2.15.3 or later immediately.

Found by: OWASP Dependency Check

🟠 HIGH payment.ts:67

Performance: N+1 query detected

Loading payment records in loop. Use batch fetch or JOIN for better performance.

Found by: Performance Review (AI)

📌 Summary: Review complete in ~120 seconds. Found 31 total issues (4 critical, 9 high, 13 medium, 5 low). PR blocked due to critical security issues. Please fix and push updates.

✅ Status check: FAILED • Cost: $0.05 • Next: Fix issues and push changes for re-review

🚀 AI-Assisted QA Pipeline

🔄 Combining Results...

📝 PR Comments Generated

Pipeline Complete!